The Draughtsman's Contract By Jim Gay
"I try very hard never to distort or dissemble," says
Mr. Neville (Anthony Higgins), a draughtsman of considerable talent
contracted by a certain Mrs. Herbert (Janet Suzman) to make 12 drawings
for her absent husband of their English estate. Part of that contract
involves Mr. Neville taking his pleasure, and that pleasure is Mrs. Herbert.
While Mr. Neville aims for fidelity in his drawings, infidelity in
private is quite another matter. Then the film becomes a cerebral puzzle
when objects start appearing mysteriously in the subjects of Mr. Neville's
various drawings: a ladder that wasn't there before, a pair of boots
standing in a field. Mr. Neville's penchant for realism is stymied by
these clues, which may or may not suggest the murder of Mr. Herbert.
Peter Greenaway seems to have directed this, his first art-house success,
with the aim of exploring the failings of perspective in art and casting
his doubtful eye on the possibility of "faithful" drawings such
as those by which Mr. Neville makes his living. Greenaway was, after
all, an art student, and must have known that drawing machines like the
one Mr. Neville uses in the film (which is set in 1694) led not only
to the invention of photography, and therefore of film itself, but also to
the renouncing of perspective that informs so much of 20th-century
painting.
In the film, Greenaway overlays the story's mysterious elements with
highly mannered tableaux, making each scene like a realistic, though
sumptuous, painting, while having his actors spout witty and complicated
sentences. While this is very entertaining, it has a dual purpose, which
is to depict the falseness of surfaces. Mr. Neville's faith in the
same is his downfall, and Greenaway's triumph is in his distortions and
dissemblings, the narrative lie that gets closer to the truth than any
architectural drawing could.
|