Boeing SSTBy Patrick Mondout
In the early years of the jet era,
some visionaries in the American aviation industry were already looking to
the day when commercial jets would fly faster than the speed of sound
which would allow them to cross the Atlantic in under five hours. These
visionaries' dreams would remain just dreams in the end. Although Congress
finally provided funding to Boeing for the creation of the first prototype
in late 1965, the funding would be cut by a more environmentally-friendly
Congress before the first American SST (Supersonic Transport) would be
built.
Competition Abroad
In the early 1960s, the British and French agreed to produce their own
SST called Concorde. The Soviets used their own
know-how and the not inconsiderable efforts of the KGB to produce their
own version called the Tu-144 which has the
distinction of being the first commercial SST flown. The race between them
was legendary.
 |
|
Boeing
2707 |
|
 |
(320).jpg) |
|
This wood mock-up is as
close as any American company came to making a
civilian supersonic transport in the 20th century.
Will we make on before the end of this century?
Stay tuned!
Image courtesy of Boeing |
|
|
|
Competition At Home
Talk is cheap but Congress put your money where its collective mouth
was when it appropriated $100M in the fiscal 1964 budget toward the
development of the American SST and in October of '63, TWA
and Pan Am stepped forward with $2.1M
towards the purchase of 21 SSTs. The question then became who is going to
build it? North American already had a remarkable military SST known as
the Valkyrie, but Boeing beat out the Lockheed
L-2000 and the North American NAC-60 (Douglas
was too strapped for cash to compete) for the contract. Boeing would one
day wish it hadn't won.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(320).jpg) |
|
| |
|
Lockheed L2000 mock-up.
|
|
|
| |
|
Image courtesy of Lockheed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While Boeing had to notice the breakneck pace the Soviets and
Anglo/French teams were proceeding at in a race to be the first with a
supersonic transport, Boeing proceeded at a more deliberate pace believing
that by delivering the biggest, fastest, and most efficient design, they
would quickly recapture any market share temporarily lost to the
Europeans. It's also true that they could not actually get innovative
design they had won with to work!
Lockheed's SST team members, which had all moved on to other projects,
were none too amused when the "new" SST Boeing came up with in
lieu of the failed design looked a lot like the original Lockheed L-2000!
Boom!
The Air Force conducted a six month experiment with military SSTs in
Oklahoma during 1964 to see what the effects of constant sonic boom
(created when the aircraft goes faster than the speed of sound) would be.
The results? Over 8,000 complaints and 5,000 claims for damages. The Air
Force noted that they recieved complaints even on days when they
weren't flying! The plane was starting to get a bad reputation and it
wasn't even off the drawing board yet.
Grumbling at Home
As it turned out, the biggest obstacle to the Boeing turned out to be a
bit closer to home: American environmentalists. They saw the SST as a very
noisy, gas guzzling polluter. And they had unprecedented power in
Washington at a critical time in the development of the SST.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
.gif) |
|
| |
|
The evolution of the Boeing SST from the
swept-wing design to the the massive 2707-300.
|
|
|
| |
|
Courtesy of NASA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President Nixon proclaimed on September 23, 1969, "The SST is
going to be built." Over $500M in federal funds had been devoted to
the project at that point - an unprecedented amount for a single
non-military project - and pressure was mounting from Senator Proxmire and
others to stop spending taxpayer money on what was a civilian project.
Demise of SST
On May 18 1971, the Senate put the final nail in the coffin by voting
to end payments to the various participants in a 58-37 vote. White House
Press Secretary Ron Ziegler blamed Boeing's unwillingness to negotiate
from its demands of between $500M and $1B to restart the project.
Congress's actions were vindicated by the decision a few years later of
almost all airlines to cancel orders for the Concorde.
While this may have been considered a loss of prestige by some
Americans and certainly disappointed many at Boeing (who lost their jobs
and were part of the biggest economic disaster in the Seattle area since
the depression), the airlines yawned. With rising fuel costs and the
success of the 747, they were no longer convinced
they needed the aircraft (though Boeing had received commitments from 26
airlines for 122 aircraft at one point).
Ask Not What Your Boeing Can Do For You...
Most Americans recall President Kennedy's "Moon Speech" where
he challenged American to put men on the moon by the end of the 1960s.
They may not remember his June 5, 1963 speech calling for government and
private sector funds to develop "a commercially successful supersonic
transport superior to that being built in any other country in the
world." LBJ and Nixon carried on this dream until the US Congress
pulled the cord on funding and Boeing did not believe it worth their while
to continue the project with their own money.
In Retrospect
As the official Soviet airline Aeroflot
bailed on their own SST within a two years of
taking delivery of them and as both Air
France and British Airways
have given up Concorde and donated them to
museums, the Americans should be glad they didn't pour any more money
into the project than they did.
I've Seen the Future and it Works
Airline industry analysts have predicted there will be a market for
300-500 third-generation SSTs by the 2020s. Of course, they've been wrong
in the past. Rest assured that if the demand is there, Boeing and Airbus
will be there too - with or without public funding. In fact, they Boeing
recently worked with the Russians to learn
what they could about their Tu-144. Read more about the development of
High-Speed Transports (HSTs) here.
|